← All Resources
Chapter 20 Companion
Partnership
AI Toolkit
The full partnership lifecycle — from identifying capability gaps to monitoring active partnerships — powered by AI prompts, automated workflows, and structured data.
Gap Analysis Prompt
Before seeking partners, you need to know what you're looking for. This prompt systematizes capability gap analysis that's traditionally done through intuition and spreadsheets.
Prompt
Analyze our strategic position and identify capability gaps:

OUR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES:
[List your 3-5 year strategic goals]

OUR CURRENT CAPABILITIES:
[List your core competencies, technologies, assets, market positions]

OUR CONSTRAINTS:
[Time to market requirements, capital limitations, talent availability]

For each strategic objective, assess:
1. What capabilities are required to achieve it?
2. Which capabilities do we have internally?
3. Which capabilities are we missing?
4. For each gap: Should we BUILD, BUY, or PARTNER?

BUILD makes sense when:
- The capability is core to long-term differentiation
- We have the talent and culture to develop it
- Time permits internal development
- The capability needs tight integration with existing systems

BUY (acquire) makes sense when:
- The capability exists in acquirable form
- Speed is critical
- The target brings talent and culture we want
- Integration complexity is manageable

PARTNER makes sense when:
- The capability is available from established providers
- We need speed but can't afford acquisition
- The capability isn't core to our differentiation
- Market dynamics are uncertain (partnership preserves flexibility)

For each capability gap, recommend an approach with reasoning.
Partner Discovery Workflow
This n8n workflow runs continuously, surfacing potential partners you'd never encounter through network-based discovery alone. The AI filters noise and prioritizes opportunities worth investigating.
n8n Workflow + Prompt
WORKFLOW: Partnership Opportunity Scanner

TRIGGER: Weekly schedule

NODES:

1. [Web Search] Query: Companies in [capability area] + recent funding

2. [Web Search] Query: [Capability] startups + partnership announcements

3. [Web Search] Query: [Industry] + strategic alliance + [year]

4. [Crunchbase API] Funding rounds in relevant categories

5. [News API] Recent coverage of companies in target space

6. [AI Node] Synthesize findings:

   PROMPT:

   Analyze these search results for potential partnership
   opportunities. We're looking for companies that have:
   [Your capability gap description]

   For each promising company identified:
   1. Company name and what they do
   2. Why they might fill our capability gap
   3. Their apparent strategic direction
   4. Recent news or developments
   5. Potential partnership fit (high/medium/low)
   6. Suggested next step to learn more

   Prioritize companies that seem:
   - Established enough to be reliable partners
   - Not so large that we'd be insignificant to them
   - Strategically aligned (not competing with us)
   - Potentially open to partnership (recent partnership activity)

7. [Supabase] Store findings in partnership_opportunities table

8. [Email] Send weekly partnership intelligence brief
Partner Evaluation Prompt
This assessment would take days to compile manually. AI synthesizes it in minutes from publicly available information. You approach potential partners informed, with specific questions and a clear sense of fit.
Prompt
PROMPT: Partnership Fit Assessment

Evaluate [Company Name] as a potential partner for [capability need]:

CAPABILITY FIT:
- What capabilities do they have that we need?
- How proven are those capabilities? (customers, case studies, reviews)
- How would their capabilities integrate with ours?
- What's their technology stack and how compatible is it?

STRATEGIC FIT:
- What's their apparent strategy? (from public statements, job postings, product direction)
- Would partnership with us advance their strategy?
- Do we compete in any areas? Would partnership create conflict?
- Are they partnered with our competitors?

CULTURAL SIGNALS:
- What do employees say? (Glassdoor, LinkedIn posts)
- What does leadership emphasize? (interviews, conference talks)
- How do they treat partners? (case studies, partner testimonials)
- What's their reputation in the market?

FINANCIAL HEALTH:
- Funding history and runway (if private)
- Revenue and profitability trends (if public)
- Customer concentration or stability concerns
- Acquisition likelihood (would they be acquired mid-partnership?)

RELATIONSHIP MAP:
- Who are the key executives we'd work with?
- Do we have any existing connections?
- Who are their other partners and what does that signal?

RISK ASSESSMENT:
- What could go wrong with this partnership?
- How dependent would we become?
- What's their incentive to maintain the partnership?
- What happens if they get acquired?

Synthesize into: RECOMMENDED / WORTH EXPLORING / PASS
With reasoning and suggested approach if recommended.
Commitment Tracking Schema
Partnerships involve mutual commitments. When your partner's commitments start slipping, that's a warning sign. When your commitments slip, you're damaging the partnership. Systematic tracking surfaces these patterns.
Supabase Schema
SUPABASE TABLE: partnership_commitments

- partnership_id
- commitment_description
- who_committed (us / them)
- committed_date
- due_date
- status (pending / completed / overdue / canceled)
- completion_notes
- impact_if_missed
Strategy Monitor Workflow
The partnership that made sense two years ago might not make sense today. Continuous monitoring catches drift before it becomes crisis.
n8n Workflow
WORKFLOW: Partner Strategy Monitor

For each active partner, weekly:
1. Scan news for announcements, leadership changes, funding events
2. Check job postings for strategic signals
3. Monitor product/feature announcements
4. Track their other partnerships
5. AI synthesis: Has anything changed that affects our partnership?

Alert when:
- They announce partnership with our competitor
- Leadership changes in our partnership area
- Strategic pivot suggested by hiring patterns
- Financial distress signals
Quarterly Partnership Review Prompt
Use this quarterly to systematically evaluate each partnership's health and decide whether to invest more, maintain, renegotiate, or wind down.
Prompt
Analyze the health of our partnership with [Partner Name]:

MUTUAL VALUE:
- What value are we providing them? Has it changed?
- What value are they providing us? Has it changed?
- Is the exchange still balanced?

EXECUTION:
- Are commitments being met on both sides?
- What's working well operationally?
- Where are the friction points?

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT:
- Are we still strategically aligned?
- Have either party's priorities shifted?
- Any competitive tensions emerging?

RELATIONSHIP:
- How strong are the personal relationships?
- Has there been leadership turnover affecting us?
- What's the communication quality?

RECOMMENDATION:
- Invest more in this partnership
- Maintain current engagement
- Renegotiate terms
- Wind down the partnership

With specific actions for the recommended approach.
From AI in Business Strategy by Sean M. Bair.
Get the book — or explore more companion resources.
Copied!